In his famous “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” oration at St. Johns Church in Richmond, Virginia on March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry said: “For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it.”

This famous phrase must be the spirit by which the Armenian Government should govern. The present government seemingly not aware of the truth places itself in a position not to provide for the worst. They have not understood the nature and role of government towards the successful creation of a free nation within the encroachment of insidious globalizers.

To begin with, it must be determined that man requires rights either from man himself or someone external to man himself, a creator. Unless there is a higher authority, man will always be tempted to enslave man. William Penn, America’s first great champion for liberty and peace wrote: “If man will not be governed by God, then they must be governed by tyrants.”

It seems that Armenia’s government has not been able to provide for the worst, because they are not able to envision impediments to nationhood relative to the creation of the ”One World Government.” Instead they have entangled themselves with the very internationalist world organizations that are in reality opposed to the existence of small sovereign nations.

Following are a few of the many globalization entities dedicated to world control:

1. United Nations (UN)
The United Nations we have been told, is the world’s “last, best hope for peace.” Peaceful resolution of conflicts and harmony among nations are noble aspirations shared by all decent people. The UN, though, has been an utter failure as a vehicle to bring about world peace. Hundreds of wars afflicted humanity since the world body’s founding in 1945. Interstate warfare, guerilla insurrections, and terrorism continue to claim their bloody toll (The New American, October 22, 2001, pg. 13). All these human calamities have been cause for increasing UN organizational entities towards their intended goal: world control. There are those knowing that for the UN to grow into a socialist world government envisioned by its founders, the world body must gain control over a military force powerful enough to impose its will. This is being successfully accomplished by individual nations (including Armenia) providing their military forces to participate in joint training exercises. These joint military exercises are nothing more than opportunities to dilute the nationalist mentality of Armenia’s soldiers, preparing them to think as the world’s armed forces. The United Nations is the vehicle towards globalization, where the world’s ethnicities and cultures will evaporate. The UN is planning a world tax. In The Global Taxman by Steve Bonta, he states: “Advocates of global government are pushing schemes for global taxation as part of the plan to mold the United Nations into a world government one step at a time” (The New American Special Report – October 22, 2001).

2. Club of Rome
The Club of Rome is a most influential world think tank whose primary purpose is to reduce the world’s population by 2 billion people through war, famine, disease and any other means necessary. The basis for their population goals is to use the environmentalism hoax. In Dr. Jacqueline Kasun’s book War Against Population she documents the shocking account of the multi-billion dollar movement of population controllers and their efforts to enforce global population control. Thomas Ferguson, the Latin American case officer for the U.S. State Department’s office of population (OPA) stated: “We will go into a country, and say, here is your no damn good development plan, throw it out the window. Start looking at the size of your population and figure out what must be done to reduce it. If you don’t like that, if you don’t want to choose to do it through (family) planning, then you’ll have an El Salvador or an Iran, or worse, a Cambodia” (Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) – March 10, 1961). It is noted he does not volunteer to be one of the 2 billion people.

3. Council of Europe (CE)
After the Armenian Government anxiously became a member, the Council of Europe’s Secretary-General Walter Schwimmer classified Armenia as a “nation at war” and threatened them to conclude an agreement with Azerbaijan regarding Nagorno Karabagh (Arminfo – Yerevan – June 2002). Now, how can Armenia be at war since there have been no hostilities for seven years? Didn’t the leadership of Hayastan realize that once becoming a member of a globalist entity they would lose control of governance? Walter Schwimmer also said, “We live in a century of globalization and the closure of borders is a natural disaster for everybody (Arminfo – Yerevan – July 2, 2002).” The question becomes: Why is the head of the Council of Europe so concerned about Armenia’s borders? If Mr. Schwimmer is so concerned about closed borders, shouldn’t he speak to those that have closed Armenia’s borders? Regarding borders, history has shown that others have always determined Armenia’s borders. If Mr. Schwimmer were concerned about Hayastan’s future, he would not be identifying it as a “pupil” and, “is moving in the right direction.” Since Mr. Schwimmer has been chairman of the Inter-Parliamentary Union Friendship Group Austria-Israel of the Austrian Parliament from 1976 to 1999, could he not convince the Israeli Government to cease training the Azerbaijan armed forces? “Israel in high level bid for Azerbaijan projects” (Jane’s Defence Weekly 12-22-99). Is Mr. Schwimmer going to govern Hayastan, or are the Armenian people going to govern themselves? Journalist Gevorg Sarkisyan, in the July 12, 2002 issue of Hayots Ashkar newspaper, reports, “Armenia is a country that supports Europe.” This has the same ring, as when Armenians hugged and embraced the young Turks in 1908 saying, “we are now brothers.” Armenia can and should relate to Europe but not be dictated to by the Council of Europe.

4. Radio Free Europe (RFE)
Radio Free Europe today is not broadcasting freedom. A certain Max Liberty, broadcasting into Armenia in December 2001, promoted bisexualism, porn stars, and religious cults, as well as advising young Armenian youth to practice free sex (Azg, December 10, 2001). This is only one of many ways to destabilize a culture that does not deserve to be contaminated. Does not the Armenian Government notice this? If so, why don’t they file an official complaint to America’s State Department? What is the Armenian Government doing to protect the national character? The United States Government finances Radio Free Europe.

5. International Criminal Court (ICC)
This world court is located in The Hague, Netherlands. It was adopted by globalists at an international conference in Rome, Italy on July 17, 1988. This world court will have the authority to override any existing nations’ courts. For example, defending rights of women and rights of children against their parents, both designed for dismantling the family structure. The ICC could declare Karabagh’s government officials as war criminals and bring them to trial. They also would have the authority to try any member of Armenia’s armed forces, overriding Armenia’s courts of justice. Historical genocides, such as the Armenian genocide, will not qualify for judgment. This international court is nothing more than another myriad of world organizations put into place for the United Nation’s enforcement capabilities.

Other examples of intrusion into Hayastan’s social fabric:

United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
This is an American Government financed agency that sent nine black students from North Carolina to Armenia. They taught Armenian youngsters the American electric-slide and hoky-poky dances (ArmeniaWeek Web page, July 5, 2002). This agency’s primary intent is to use the do-gooder environmentalist scare as a weapon “to change a nation’s national economic development strategies consistent with their environmental goals.” What goals are they speaking of? Shutting down Armenia’s atomic power plant? Following is one of their statements of intent relative to the world’s nations: “Has a comprehensive environmental policy framework been established that is appropriate to changing economic and social circumstances?” Isn’t it odd that these nine young folks were not sent to Africa to experience “changing their economy and social circumstances?”

Controlling Armenia’s News Media
The Armenian Government’s denial of television stations A1+ and Noyan Tapan of their broadcast licensing was an example of government tyranny manipulating free speech. It was replaced by a company called Sharm that had no experience and whose programming is to consist of sports, fashion shows, and music. The Armenian Government, instead of silencing a quality Armenian television station and news media, should close up CNN and send it back to where it came from. While in Hayastan during 1997, it was noted that CNN programming had subtle mind molding world news programming with a mixture of immorality. It had nothing to add to Armenia’s intellectual or national stature. Only nations with freedom of thought are able to withstand adversity.

Conclusion
Isn’t it a shame that a number of very successful Armenians in the Diaspora having great love for their people brought their enterprises into Hayastan for the country’s survival, while the government is burdening the country by borrowing the nation into debt and selling the nation’s assets such as its goldmines.

What makes us proud of being Armenian in this period of history? Are we proud of being saddled with the anti-Christ World Council of Churches after 1700 years of Christianity? To be scattered all over the world losing our identity within two generations, while in Hayastan survival of the race is in the realm of pragmatism instead of protecting national values? Fortunately there is not a shortage of patriots in Hayastan. They will die on the soil before leaving it. They have grasped the only weapon for survival of the race by indoctrinating youth with the national spirituality of General Karekin Nezhdeh, who in 1920 was responsible for securing Zangezour (the southern half of what constitutes present Hayastan), by confronting Russian Communist forces for 40 days. These patriots are imbued with the breath of Karekin Nezhdeh, who not only was a great military leader, but a giant of philosophical thought and unselfish devotion to the future of the race. While imprisoned in Siberia by the Soviets, his writings in prison have been acquired and incorporated into a volume, which is today being extensively read in Hayastan. A few statements made by him deserve repeating: “When signing a treaty, use some of my blood for the signature.” “In my life, besides my conscience, I got to know two other judges – God and the people. I sinned against God, but never against the people.”

These present day patriots are fully aware of the untenable landlocked geographical situation the nation is in, but they are proud of those patriots that secured Karabagh against all odds. These are the individuals and groups that should be encouraged and supported, so that the fabric of the nation remains intact. Then, with physical and intellectual patriotism in place, all national and international interactions could be wisely resolved.

Boca Raton, Florida USA7-23-02